Le Pantload makes a fool of himself. Again.

This time, he compares Obama's national service plan to slavery, twisting himself into a pretzel as he whines about government and sings the praises of volunteerism. Volunteerism, by the way, is exactly what Obama is proposing. Check out Obama's Web site and you'll see that he calls for...get ready for this...universal voluntary public service. That's what it's called right there on the Web site.

In other words, something other than slavery.

Meanwhile, I hope Pantload is simply volunteering as an op-ed writer, because I hate the thought of the LA Times (or any paper) paying him to write this stuff.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tell us something we don't already know

The MTA is clueless. Man, if you need a place to vent or learn the full story behind mass transit horror stories, check out Gothamist. The MTA admitted that the service was not acceptable on many accounts, from the flooding to the fact that the MTA's website was overwhelmed. Then there's also the fact that the MTA was urging people not to take the subways and opt for a bus instead, only for buses to be (A) few and far between and (B) crowded as anything. They forgot to mention "(C) fucking slow." Don't the people at the MTA feel really stupid when they say shit like this? MTA CEO Lee Sander said, "We really are sorry about the inconvenience that New Yorkers had to deal with. In terms of how it happened, we had three inches of rain in an hour. The system is designed to handle 1.5 inches." This isn't quite as appalling as last year's 9-day Queens blackout--you know, the one where Con Ed lied about the number of places without power--but it still in...
Read more

Some perspective, please

Yes, President Obama isn't perfect. Yes, he should just close Gitmo already. Yes, it would be great if he'd act on his campaign promise of more transparency in government. But c'mon, people, he's not another George W. Bush. A quick comparison of their administrations will show this. Criticize the guy, sure, but let's not pretend it's still 2005, hear?
Read more